Record decision to keep 48.0V discharge floor (improvement #3)
Reviewed the cutoff/stop-discharge floor; deliberately kept at 48.0V (3.00 V/cell) for cycle-life margin. Lowering to 46-47V unlocks only a few % of LFP capacity and isn't worth deeper cycling on this large, non-capacity-constrained bank. Comment only; no value change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
|
|||||||
# stop_charge 54.0 V — grid charges only to ~mid-knee; solar handles the bulk top-off
|
# stop_charge 54.0 V — grid charges only to ~mid-knee; solar handles the bulk top-off
|
||||||
# stop_dis 48.0 V = 3.000 V/cell — soft "switch to grid" point
|
# stop_dis 48.0 V = 3.000 V/cell — soft "switch to grid" point
|
||||||
# cutoff 48.0 V = 3.000 V/cell — inverter hard shutdown floor (BMS still protects below)
|
# cutoff 48.0 V = 3.000 V/cell — inverter hard shutdown floor (BMS still protects below)
|
||||||
|
# (Floor reviewed 2026-06-24: deliberately kept at 48.0/3.00 V for cycle-life margin.
|
||||||
|
# Lowering to 46-47 V would unlock only a few % of usable LFP capacity and isn't
|
||||||
|
# worth the deeper cycling on this large, non-capacity-constrained bank.)
|
||||||
# Conservative off-grid policy: keep grid as a soft top-up, let solar do the bulk work.
|
# Conservative off-grid policy: keep grid as a soft top-up, let solar do the bulk work.
|
||||||
#
|
#
|
||||||
# Current rationale (600 Ah bank):
|
# Current rationale (600 Ah bank):
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user