<?xml version="1.0"?>
<ArrayOfFBEvent xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Dan McFadden</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Edited</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2024-01-02T16:21:00Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Justin Richardson</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Edited</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-10-12T21:15:52Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Justin Richardson</User>
    <Comment>Verified with datapro   4.1.468 and 4.2.182 

Voltage channels does not exist in 4.0  so  that code fix is not exposed to user per Jerry ...



</Comment>
    <StatusString>Closed</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-10-12T21:02:38Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>Closed</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Justin Richardson</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Edited</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-10-12T20:28:47Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Justin Richardson</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Assigned</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-10-12T15:29:03Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment>The re-activation is due to the mishandling of Voltage input channels in multiple ROI channel naming.

49712 is 4.0; 49713 is 4.1; 49714 is 4.2

To test:
Include Voltage Input channels in a Test Setup's multiple ROI channels, and ensure that they don't get unassigned when the Test Setup is saved.</Comment>
    <StatusString>Resolved</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-10-12T00:24:06Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>Resolved</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Assigned</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-10-11T15:59:32Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment>Reactivating due to bug found by Justin when assigning one channel to each ROI.  Channel names are stored correctly in the database, but are then processed incorrectly after reading from the database.</Comment>
    <StatusString>Reactivated</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-10-10T17:47:18Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>Reactivated</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jaime Lopez</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Assigned</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-10-02T22:07:21Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Dan McFadden</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>ReleaseNoted</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-09-27T18:47:37Z</TimeStamp>
    <ReleaseNote>Addresses an issue where channels would not load as being assigned to an ROI after saving a test setup</ReleaseNote>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Edited</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-09-21T23:05:50Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment>Additionally, the data should correctly download and be viewed from the Download Data tab, but there is an existing issue for the failure to Export from the Download Data tab (bug 34255).</Comment>
    <StatusString>Edited</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-09-21T23:00:54Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment>To test:
Import the attached 3.3 Test Setup into DataPRO 3.3.xxx.
Install DataPRO 4.0, and either migrate the 3.3 database which has the just-imported Test Setup, or (easier) simply import the attached 4.0 Test Setup into DataPRO 4.0.xxxx.

If there is not enough DAS to test all at once, separate the Test Setup into "with ECM" and "without ECM".

1) Ensure that all of the same channels are checked in the "ROI x Channels" step of Edit Test Setup.

2) Run the Test Setup, manually assign the two channels with missing hardware as shown in the Check sensor ID step, and ensure that all of the same channels are checked when reaching the Download ROI step of Run Test.

3) Ensure that the correct channels are downloaded, can be viewed, and can export correctly.
</Comment>
    <StatusString>Resolved</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-09-21T22:56:42Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>Resolved</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment>This issue was opened to address the bug Nate found when doing multiple ROI using channels in a Test Setup that are assigned to an ECM-connected DAS, and the Compact button is selected in the Hardware step.

This fix continues to massage the string decorations used to uniquely identify a channel, but this is a hard-to-maintain/wrong design.  I've opened a new issue to refactor this design to mimic how Level Trigger channels are identified instead, but Calspan was waiting on this fix.  There is no need to apply the attached 4.0 patch - it's already in the 4.0.1061 build.

There are many different scenarios that affect how the channel-naming is done for multiple ROIs:

Channel with an analog sensor with an ID but assigned to a different hardware channel than where it is actually plugged in, Channel with an analog sensor with an ID and assigned to the same hardware channel as it is plugged into, Channel with an analog sensor with an ID and not assigned to a hardware channel, Channel with an analog sensor with no ID and assigned to a hardware channel, Channel with an analog sensor with no ID and not assigned to a hardware channel, Channel with a squib sensor with an ID and assigned to a hardware channel, Channel with a squib sensor with an ID and not assigned to a hardware channel.

all with ECM-attached DAS with either Compact and Expanded selected in the Hardware step, all with USB-attached DAS, 

I've attached a 3.3 Test Setup that contain all of the above scenarios, as well as the same Test Setup migrated with this patch to 4.0.
</Comment>
    <StatusString>Edited</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-09-21T22:46:38Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Edited</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-09-21T22:44:35Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment>49623, 49627, and 49629 are 4.0; 49630 is 4.1; 49631 is 4.2</Comment>
    <StatusString>Edited</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-09-21T20:25:13Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Dan McFadden</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Edited</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-09-12T20:57:52Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Dan McFadden</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Assigned</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-09-12T20:11:22Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Dan McFadden</User>
    <Comment>#12395 Calspan | DataPRO Multiple ROIs Unassigned when Channels Modified
 
 
 
 
Submitted
 
September 12, 2023 at 11:54
 
   
 
Received via
 
Web Form
 
   
 
Requester
 
Griffin Murray &lt;griffin.murray@calspan.com&gt;
 
 
 
 
CCs
 
Ariel Muckenhirn &lt;ariel.muckenhirn@dtsweb.com&gt;, Dan McFadden &lt;dan.mcfadden@dtsweb.com&gt;, Alexander Finley &lt;alexander.finley@calspan.com&gt;, Steve Keller &lt;steve.keller@calspan.com&gt;
 
 
 
 
Status
 
Open
 
   
 
Type
 
Problem
 
   
 
Priority
 
Normal
 
   
 
Group
 
Support
 
   
 
Assignee
 
Nathan Brown
 
   
 
Ticket status
 
Open
 
 
 
 
 
Ticket Source
 
Help Center
 
   
 
Product Family
 
Software::DataPRO
 
   
 
Software Version
 
4.0.1043
 
   
 
Problem Source
 
Software::Software Bug
 
   
 
Current Department [Optional]
 
Tech Support
 
   
 
Customer Country
 
United States of America
 
   
 
Service Location
 
DTS Michigan
 
   
 
Customer State
 
New York
 
 
 
 
 
Nathan Brown September 12, 2023 at 11:54
 
 
Griffin reports that when using DataPRO 4.1.1043 to configure a Multiple ROI test, if the user assigns Channels x ROI, then makes any changes to the Channel list (changes an ISO code or description, for example), ALL of the Channels x ROI assignments are cleared.
  
 This can be tedious to reassign 200+ channels in a test
 
 
 
 
 
Support Software by Zendesk</Comment>
    <StatusString>Opened</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-09-12T20:11:21Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>Opened</Status>
  </FBEvent>
</ArrayOfFBEvent>