<?xml version="1.0"?>
<ArrayOfFBEvent xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Dan McFadden</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Edited</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2024-01-02T16:21:25Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jaime Lopez</User>
    <Comment>Verified with 4.2.218, 4.1.485, 4.0.1081</Comment>
    <StatusString>Closed</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-11-07T21:25:47Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>Closed</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jaime Lopez</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Assigned</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-11-06T22:20:16Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Edited</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-10-31T14:58:00Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment>49828 is 4.2 fix for part of patch being omitted.</Comment>
    <StatusString>Edited</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-10-31T14:57:40Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment>The reason for re-activation was not reproduced, but a different bug, introduced in 4.0.1070, 4.1.468, and 4.2.182 on 10/11/2023.

49825 is 4.0; 49826 is 4.1; 49827 is 4.2.</Comment>
    <StatusString>Resolved</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-10-30T20:38:20Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>Resolved</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Assigned</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-10-27T20:21:25Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Dan McFadden</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Edited</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-10-25T21:26:14Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jaime Lopez</User>
    <Comment>Reactivated: I did not get correct checkboxes. Maybe test setup is not correct
 
SW Used: DataPRO v4.0.1074
 
Tested:
 
 
With a S6A I discovered and queried hardware
 
with 1 sensor with an EID I navigated to sensor database and assigned this sensor to channel 2. Read ID
 
 
I then removed EID from channel 2 to channel 1 and included channel 1 in test setup
 
Ran test and verified the that this sensor with EID used the specified ROIs 
 
 
 
In hardware step still assigned to channel 2</Comment>
    <StatusString>Reactivated</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-10-17T21:44:06Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>Reactivated</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jaime Lopez</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Assigned</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-08-21T20:55:24Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Dan McFadden</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>ReleaseNoted</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-08-15T17:59:15Z</TimeStamp>
    <ReleaseNote>Addresses an issue with multiple ROIs and sensors with EIDs</ReleaseNote>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Dan McFadden</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Edited</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-08-15T15:16:10Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment>Correctly set ROI channels in Download step when channels are assigned by EID and different hardware is assigned by EID than was assigned in the Test Setup.

49360 is 4.0; 49361 is 4.1; 49362 is 4.2

To test:
Create a Test Setup with a channel that has a sensor with and EID, and is assigned to a different hardware channel than where it is plugged in.  Use that channel in a multiple ROI, and ensure that it is checked after reaching the Download ROI step.</Comment>
    <StatusString>Edited</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-08-10T19:24:33Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment>49353 is 4.0; 49354 is 4.1; 49355 is 4.2

Correctly set ROI channels in Download step when channels are assigned by EID and no hardware is assigned.

To test:

Create a Test Setup with channel(s) in a Group that are assigned by ID and are not assigned to Hardware before the test is run. Include these channel(s) in multiple ROIs.

Ensure that when the Download step is reached, that the correct checkboxes are checked.</Comment>
    <StatusString>Edited</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-08-09T18:32:30Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment>Don't display "Channel ... has not been assigned to an enabled Region of Interest" when downloading, if all have been assigned.
49348 is 4.0; 49349 is 4.1; 49350 is 4.2

To test: Download multiple ROIs and ensure that the above error message is not displayed.</Comment>
    <StatusString>Edited</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-08-08T16:03:00Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment>49334 is 4.0; 49335 is 4.1; 49336 is is 4.2.

To test:
Create a Test Setup with multiple ROIs, and include a channel with a sensor that has an EID in one of the ROIs.
Ensure that the channel remains as part of the ROI (box checked) after saving the Test Setup.</Comment>
    <StatusString>Resolved</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-08-04T23:29:08Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>Resolved</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Assigned</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-08-04T19:54:53Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment>When a Test Setup with multiple ROIs has a sensor with an EID, the corresponding channel is not included in the ROI.  The problem is that the channel name is prepended with "Assigned by EID", causing the parsing of the name to extract the sensor serial number to be incorrect.</Comment>
    <StatusString>Edited</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-08-04T15:36:56Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Assigned</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-08-03T21:22:19Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>UNKNOWN</Status>
  </FBEvent>
  <FBEvent>
    <User>Jerry Lawrence</User>
    <Comment />
    <StatusString>Opened</StatusString>
    <TimeStamp>2023-08-03T21:22:18Z</TimeStamp>
    <ZendeskNumber>0</ZendeskNumber>
    <Status>Opened</Status>
  </FBEvent>
</ArrayOfFBEvent>